Previous Page  272 / 300 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 272 / 300 Next Page
Page Background

Notes forming part of onancial statements (Contd.)

272

Annual Report 2016-17

The following table gives details in respect of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts:

As at March 31, 2017

As at March 31, 2016

Foreign

currency

(million)

Average

rate

`

(million)

Foreign

currency

(million)

Average

rate

`

(million)

Derivatives designated as

cash pow hedges

Forward contracts

USD

90.00

70.67 6,360.30

104.00

69.74 7,252.54

The foreign exchange forward contracts mature within twelve months. The table below analyses the derivative onancial

instruments into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period as of the balance sheet date:

As at March 31, 2017

As at March 31, 2016

Foreign

currency

(million)

Average

rate

`

(million)

Foreign

currency

(million)

Average

rate

`

(million)

Not later than 3 months

29.00

70.75 2,051.61

30.00

68.15 2,044.50

/ater than 3 months and not

later than 6 months

30.00

70.72 2,121.67

29.00

69.59

2,018.11

/ater than 6 months and not

later than 9 months

24.00

70.53 1,692.64

27.00

70.26

1,897.02

/ater than 9 months and not

later than 12 months

7.00

70.63 494.38

18.00

71.83

1,292.91

Total

90.00

6,360.30

104.00

7,252.54

Credit risk

Credit risk refers to the risk of default on its obligation by the counterparty resulting in a onancial loss. The maximum

exposure to the credit risk at the reporting date is primarily from trade receivables amounting to

`

4,781.35 million

and

`

3,815.07 million as at March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively. Trade receivables are typically unsecured

and are derived from revenue earned from customers primarily located in the United States. Credit risk is managed by

the Company by Credit Task Force through credit approvals, establishing credit limits and continuously monitoring the

recovery status of customers to which the Company grants credit terms in the normal course of business. On account

of adoption of Ind AS 109, the Company uses expected credit loss model to assess the impairment loss. The Company

uses a provisioning policy approved by the Board of Directors to compute the expected credit loss allowance for trade

receivables. The policy takes into account available external and internal credit risk factors and the Company’s historical

experience for customers.

Credit risk is perceived mainly in case of receivables overdue for more than 90 days. The following table gives details of

risk concentration in respect of percentage of receivables overdue for more than 90 days:

As at

March 31, 2017

March 31, 2016

Receivables overdue for more than 90 days (

`

million)*

528.22

373.08

Total receivables (gross) (

`

million)

5,004.94

4,030.02

Overdue for more than 90 days as a % of total receivables

11%

9%

* Out of this amount,

`

223.59 million (March 31, 2016:

`

214.95 million) have been provided for.