Previous Page  246 / 327 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 246 / 327 Next Page
Page Background

246

• Annual Report 2018-19

Shaping the future of software driven business

Notes forming part of consolidated financial statements (Contd.)

The following table gives details in respect of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts:

As at March 31, 2019

As at March 31, 2018

Foreign

currency

(million)

Average

rate

`

(million)

Foreign

currency

(million)

Average

rate

`

(million)

Derivatives designated as cash

flow hedges

Forward contracts

USD

112.00

73.00

8,175.45

103.00

66.95

6,895.53

The foreign exchange forward contracts mature within twelve months. The table below analyses the derivative financial

instruments into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period as of the balance sheet date:

As at March 31, 2019

As at March 31, 2018

Foreign

currency

(million)

Average

rate

`

(million)

Foreign

currency

(million)

Average

rate

`

(million)

Not later than 3 months

30.00

69.95 2,098.38

25.00

66.79

1,669.69

Later than 3 months and not later

than 6 months

30.00

74.00

2,220.06

24.00

66.72

1,601.25

Later than 6 months and not later

than 9 months

30.00

74.84

2,245.19

25.00

66.93

1,673.26

Later than 9 months and not later

than 12 months

22.00

73.26

1,611.82

29.00

67.29

1,951.33

Total

112.00

8,175.45

103.00

6,895.53

Credit risk

Credit risk refers to the risk of default on its obligation by the counterparty resulting in a financial loss. The maximum exposure

to the credit risk at the reporting date is primarily from trade receivables. As at March 31, 2019, trade receivables amounted to

`

4,923.01 million (March 31, 2018:

`

4,847.40 million).

Trade receivables are typically unsecured and are derived from revenue earned from customers primarily located in the

United States. Credit risk is managed by the Group by Credit Task Force through credit approvals, establishing credit limits

and continuously monitoring the recovery status of customers to which the Group grants credit terms in the normal course of

business.

On account of adoption of Ind AS 109, the Group uses expected credit loss model to assess the impairment loss. The Group uses a

provisioning policy approved by the Board of Directors to compute the expected credit loss allowance for trade receivables. The

policy takes into account available external and internal credit risk factors and the Group’s historical experience for customers.

Credit risk is perceived mainly in case of receivables overdue for more than 90 days. The following table gives details of risk

concentration in respect of percentage of receivables overdue for more than 90 days:

As at

March 31, 2019

March 31, 2018

Receivables overdue for more than 90 days (

`

million)*

284.19

271.99

Total receivables (gross) (

`

million)

5,057.55

4,994.37

Overdue for more than 90 days as a % of total receivables

5.6%

5.4%

* Out of this amount,

`

134.54 million (March 31, 2018:

`

146.97 million) have been provided for.