

Unfortunately, TPC-H has received multiple criticisms, from both MPP database vendors and analysts, and it is
disappointing that some of the most popular vendors (Teradata, IBM Netezza, HP Vertica, Pivotal Greenplum) have
basically shunned it. Only a handful of DBMS vendors continue measuring their systems, among which there are
Microsoft (although not for their MPP database), Oracle, Actian, Exasol, and Sybase IQ. Nevertheless, MPP
databases (“Clustered systems” in the TPC-H terminology) have beenmeasured to be generally superior to traditional
non-clustered systems, both in performance and in price/performance. Here is a snapshot of the results for the 3000
GB size:
You can see that the ‘cluster’ column of the first product is a ‘Y’ and the two others are ‘N’. Details on each system can
be obtained by clicking on the link under the System column. For instance, the Exasol database results were run on a
Dell cluster of 28 bi-processor servers. The second line results, for the Actian database, were obtained on an HPE
SMP machine with 4 multi-core processors. Here are the results for the 10 TB (10,000 GB) database size, in where
29MSFT SQLServer recently posted a world record in this TPC-H 10 TB “non-clustered” category . The ratio in terms of
QphHwidens fromabout 8:2 to 10:1 with the size increase, an expected result.
—
Hardware infrastructure
. Assessing the server and network infrastructure required to support the desired
performance and scalability is addressed in
pages 362 and 363. It is best to keep a factor of safety margin
[1]while planning for hardware by considering factors like back-up storage, multi-user concurrent load,
unplanned shut-downs, network issues etc. Hard-disk, CPU cores and memory are predominant factors while
arriving at optimal hardware needs.
W H I T E P A P E R
29
This was on a Lenovo x3850 X6 system that was configured with four Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4 processors at 2.20 GHz (4 processors/96
cores/192 threads), 6 TB of memory, and eight SanDisk ioMemory SX350 6.4TB PCIe flash adapters.
© 2017 Persistent Systems Ltd. All rights reserved. 71
3,000 GB Results
Rank Company
System
QphH Price/QphH Watts/KQphH System
Availability
Database
Operating System
Date
Submitted Cluster
1
Dell PowerEdge R720xd
using EXASolution 5.0
7,808,386
.15 USD
NR
09/24/14 EXASOL EXASolution
5.0
EXASOL EXA Cluster OS
5.0
09/23/14
Y
2
HPE ProLiant DL580
Gen9 Actian Vector 5.0
2,140,307
.38 USD
NR
07/31/16 Actian Vector 5.0
Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Server 7.2
06/02/16
N
3
Cisco UCS C460 M4
Server
1,071,018
.60 USD
NR
06/01/16 Microsoft SQL Server
2016 Enterprise Edition
Microsoft Windows Server
2012 R2 Standard Edition 05/14/16
N
www.persistent.com
10,000 GB Results
Rank Company
System
QphH Price/QphH Watts/KQphH System
Availability
Database
Operating System
Date
Submitted Cluster
1
Dell PowerEdge R720xd
using EXASolution 5.0
10,133,244 .17 USD
NR
09/24/14 EXASOL EXASolution
5.0
EXASOL EXA Cluster OS
5.0
09/23/14
Y
2
Cisco UCS C460 M4
Server
1,115,298
.87 USD
NR
11/28/16 Microsoft SQL Server
2016 Enterprise Edition
Microsoft Windows Server
2016 Standard Edition
11/28/16
N